"Eric Wertman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm no expert, but this would seem like a good example of something > that python wasn't good for. I have always wondered, though, what a > Linux kernel module would look like that had a python (or java, or > whatever) interpreter running low-level, so the higher level > components on the operating system could be implemented in an > interpreted language. Is there any benefit to something like that? > Or is that crap too? Again, I'm no expert.
This was done 20 years ago with the Lisp machine. Really, it was a bold idea back then, but programming language and systems understanding have comea long way since then. Best to keep using Python as a scripting language; it's not the right thing for an OS. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
