Roy Smith wrote: > I've used the standard unittest (pyunit) module on a few projects in the > past and have always thought it basicly worked fine but was just a little > too complicated for what it did. > > I'm starting a new project now and I'm thinking of trying py.test > (http://codespeak.net/py/current/doc/test.html). It looks pretty cool > from > the docs. Is there anybody out there who has used both packages and can > give a comparative review?
Have you seen Grig Gheorghiu's 3 part comparison of unittest, and py.test? http://agiletesting.blogspot.com/2005/01/python-unit-testing-part-1-unittest.html http://agiletesting.blogspot.com/2005/01/python-unit-testing-part-2-doctest.html http://agiletesting.blogspot.com/2005/01/python-unit-testing-part-3-pytest-tool.html -- Nigel Rowe A pox upon the spammers that make me write my address like.. rho (snail) swiftdsl (stop) com (stop) au -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
