On 26 сент, 17:03, MRAB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 26, 9:52 am, redbaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 26 ÓÅÎÔ, 04:20, Istvan Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Sep 25, 8:40šam, "Max Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > At any time in main process there are shouldn't be no more than two > > > > copies of data > > > > (one original data and one result). > > > > From the looks of it you are storing a lots of references to various > > > copies of your data via the async set. > > > How could I avoid of storing them? I need something to check does it > > ready or not and retrieve results if ready. I couldn't see the way to > > achieve same result without storing asyncs set. > > You could give each worker process an ID and then have them put the ID > into a queue to signal to the main process when finished. And how could I retrieve result from worker process without async?
> > BTW, your test-case modifies the asyncs set while iterating over it, > which is a bad idea. My fault, there was list(asyncs) originally. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
