On Sep 22, 11:46 pm, "Aaron \"Castironpi\" Brady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 22, 5:32 pm, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > cybersource.com.au> wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:41:46 +1000, James Mills wrote: > > > On 22 Sep 2008 09:07:43 GMT, Steven D'Aprano > > >> But that's precisely what I want to avoid: I don't want the objects to > > >> share *any* state, not even their class. I'm not trying for a Borg or > > >> Singleton: the user can call the factory as many times as they want, > > >> but the objects returned shouldn't share any state. I don't know if > > >> what I want has a name. Judging from people's reactions, I'd say > > >> probably not. > > > > Snce when are "users" ever involved > > > in programming problems or programming languages ? > > > What an astounding question. > > > Consider a class. There are the programmers who write the class, and > > there are the programmers (possibly the same people, but not necessarily) > > who use the class. The second set of people, the programmers who use the > > class, are *users* of the class. What else would they be? > > > -- > > Steven > > Usegrammers?
And professionals are programmers, amateurs are amgrammers and newbies are newgrammers? :-) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
