On 20 Sep., 12:14, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kay Schluehr wrote: > > Answer: if you want to define an entity it has to be defined inside a > > class. If you want to access an entity you have to use the dot > > operator. Therefore Java is OO but Python is not. > > you're satirising the quoted author's cargo-cultish view of object > orientation, right? > > </F>
I wonder if the OO fetish hasn't already lost much of its magic powers. What are the most powerful fetishes these days? A year ago I would have suspected "purely functional" but I'm not sure it has really caught on. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
