On Sep 18, 7:42 pm, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED] cybersource.com.au> wrote: > On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:43:00 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote: > > Now the obvious winner is pruebono - even unoptimized, using sets seems > > to be *way* faster than even the most optimized corrected version of > > your algorithm. > > I'm not being snarky about losing priority here, but I submitted > essentially the same solution two hours earlier than pruebono. > > Are people not seeing my posts? Have I been kill-filed by everyone except > Mensator? I also asked a question about HTTPError and I haven't seen any > responses at all. > > -- > Steven
I see your post now, but I didn't notice it at the time I posted. Could be because I am using the noticeable bad Google groups interface that is known for being unreliable. Duplicate solutions on Usenet are almost a given and I consider duplicate solutions a good thing, it means that other people will be able to understand that code. In any case I am not here for glory I am posting under a pseudonym so nobody discovers that I am slacking off at work reading Usen[carrier lost] -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
