Vinay Sajip schrieb:
> On Aug 27, 11:28 am, Thomas Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I came up with a workaround that seems to do what I want.  I add a NULL 
>> handler
>> to my top-level logger which is not the root logger but a logger named 
>> 'comtypes',
>> other loggers are named 'comtypes.something...'.  So the application 
>> developer
>> using the library will not see any comtypes logger messages at all, unless
>> he calls 'logging.basicConfig()', for example.
>>
> 
> This is a good solution - I'll add this as a suggestion in the
> documentation.

Cool.

BTW:  Let me say that the more I use logging the more I like it.
logging is a fantastic package!

Thanks,
Thomas
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to