On 25.08.2008, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wroted: > The newish sorted() and reversed() built-ins were meant to complement > list.sort and list.reverse, not replace them.
BTW, is there a reason why sorted() on a list returns a list, while reversed() on the same list returns an iterator? GS -- Grzegorz Staniak <gstaniak _at_ wp [dot] pl> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
