Hello! >> Also, lool at that: >> class Mother(object): >> def __init__(self, param_mother='optional', **eat): >> print 'Mother' >> class Father(object): >> def __init__(self, param_father='optional', **eat): >> print 'Father' >> class Child(Mother, Father): >> def __init__(self, **ham): >> super(Child, self).__init__(**ham) >> child = Child(param_mother=1, param_father=1) >> Father's init will not be called. > Change Father/Mother.__init__() to call the superclass initializer. It may > be counterintuitive, but it works.
OK, thanks, with the super(...).__init__() in Father/Mother it workes and makes sense. So, the last thing a *realy* don't like ist the __init__(self, param, **ignore_the_rest) thing. Anyone had troubles with that, or should I cust take this as a "python way of thinking" ... ;-), and getting used to that? Thanks, AXEL. -- "Aber naja, ich bin eher der Forentyp." Wolfibolfi's outing in http://www.informatik-forum.at/showpost.php?p=206342&postcount=10 -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
