Dnia Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:03:49 +0200, Fredrik Lundh napisa�(a): > not talking for the 3.X developers here, but os.popen is a binding to > the POSIX popen function, so I'm not sure it makes that much sense to > actually deprecate it. > > the os.popen[234], popen2, and commands stuff are different -- they're a > a series of attempts to provide more functionality by building on > lower-level primitives, something that the subprocess module does a lot > better.
This makes sense. My idea that some developer had forgotten to add the deprecation warning for os.popen() goes to the bin. -- Regards, Wojtek Walczak, http://www.stud.umk.pl/~wojtekwa/
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
