Stefan Behnel a écrit :
Jack wrote:
I know one benchmark doesn't mean much but it's still disappointing to see Python as one of the slowest languages in the test:

http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/07/performance-comparison-c-java-python-ruby-jython-jruby-groovy/

Just ignore that. If the code had been designed for Python from the start, it
would have performed a lot better.

Currently it looks like syntax-adapted Java code to me.

Yeps, sure. I don't have time for this now, but I think I would have choose an itertool based solution here instead of that hand-made linked list.

Stefan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to