Jack wrote: > I know one benchmark doesn't mean much but it's still disappointing to see > Python as one of the slowest languages in the test: > > http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/07/performance-comparison-c-java-python-ruby-jython-jruby-groovy/ >
Just ignore that. If the code had been designed for Python from the start, it would have performed a lot better. Currently it looks like syntax-adapted Java code to me. Stefan -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
