Miles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> If it is just a matter of different rendering, what's the reason for >> doing it like that? Wouldn't it be more consistent and straightforward >> to denote builtin types as classes as well? > > Yes, and in Python 3, it will be so: > [..]
> http://svn.python.org/view?rev=23331&view=rev That makes matters absolutely clear. Thanks a lot. No more questions from my side ;-). Best, -Nikolaus -- »It is not worth an intelligent man's time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.« -J.H. Hardy PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
