Carl Banks wrote:
On Jul 30, 1:58 am, "Russ P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 29, 10:33 pm, Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 30, 1:15 am, "Russ P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Having said that, it would sure be nice to be able to write
if myList is not empty:
instead of
if len(myList) != 0:
I can agree with this.
But I guess that could only work if there were only one empty list
that represents all empty lists (as there is only one actual "None").
I don't know if that makes sense or not.
I mean in general. I wouldn't spell it like that. I would prefer if
empty(x), with an __empty__ method. (And support __nonzero__ aka
__bool__ dropped completely.)
Carl Banks
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
__nonzero__ is not only meaningful for sequence types.
-Matt
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
