On Jul 28, 12:08 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's a very simple idea that you insist on > > making complicated. As I said, I could write a pre-processor myself to > > implement it in less than a day. > > Preprocessor are not a solution. Sorry.
I never said that a pre-processor is a good permanent solution, but the simple fact that my proposal can be done with a simple pre- processor means that it does not change the inner workings of the Python interpreter. > Oh, you don't stand people disagreing with you, that's it ? I can stand people disagreeing with me all day long, so long as they are making sense. You are simply making the issue more complicated that it is because you are apparently incapable of understanding the substance of it. > > You seem to think that being a "regular" on this newsgroup somehow > > gives you special status. > > Why so ? Because I answer to your proposition and not agree with your > arguments ??? C'mon, be serious, you have the right to post your > proposition here, I have the right to post my reaction to your > proposition, period. Grow up, boy. > Boy, I don't know who you think you're talking to, but you're obviously > out of luck here. I'm 41, married, our son is now a teenager, I have an > happy social life, quite a lot of work, and no time to waste in the > streets. And FWIW, name-calling won't buy you much here. There you go again. Do you think you are proving something by addressing me as "boy"? I'll make a little wager with you. I'll bet that what I am using Python for dwarfs in importance what you are using it for. Care to put the cards on the table, big man? I'll tell you something else while I'm at it. I'm ten years older than you, but I pump iron and stay in excellent shape. If you addressed me as "boy" in person, I'd be more than happy to teach you a badly needed lesson you won't soon forget, big man. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
