"Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>>From `pydoc os`:
>>
>> symlink(...)
>> symlink(src, dst)
>>
>> Create a symbolic link pointing to src named dst.
>>
>>
>> Is there any reason why this is so deliberately confusing? Why is the
>> target of the symlink, the think where it points *to*, called the
>> `src`? It seems to me that the names of the parameters should be
>> reversed.
>
> I used the command the other day, and didn't feel the slightest confusion.
>
> To me, the process of creating a symlink is like a "virtual copy".
> Which the above parameter names reflect perfectly.
Is this interpretation really widespread? I couldn't find any other
sources using it. On the other hand:
From ln(2):
,----
| SYNOPSIS
| ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
|
| DESCRIPTION
| In the 1st form, create a link to TARGET with the name LINK_NAME.
`----
From Wikipedia:
,----
| A symbolic link merely contains a text string that is interpreted and
| followed by the operating system as a path to another file or
| directory. It is a file on its own and can exist independently of its
| target. If a symbolic link is deleted, its target remains unaffected.
| If the target is moved, renamed or deleted, any symbolic link that
| used to point to it continues to exist but now points to a
| non-existing file.
`----
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
»It is not worth an intelligent man's time to be in the majority.
By definition, there are already enough people to do that.«
-J.H. Hardy
PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
