Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Torsten Bronger wrote:
>>>> Hallöchen!
>>> > And why does this make the implicit insertion of "self" difficult?
>>>> I could easily write a preprocessor which does it after all.
>>> class C():
>>> def f():
>>> a = 3
>>>
>>> Inserting self into the arg list is trivial. Mindlessly deciding
>>> correctly whether or not to insert 'self.' before 'a' is impossible
>>> when 'a' could ambiguously be either an attribute of self or a local
>>> variable of f. Or do you and/or Jordan plan to abolish local
>>> variables for methods?
>>
>> Why do you think that 'self' should be inserted anywhere except in the
>> arg list? AFAIU, the idea is to remove the need to write 'self' in the
>> arg list, not to get rid of it entirely.
>
> Because you must prefix self attributes with 'self.'. If you do not
> use any attributes of the instance of the class you are making the
> function an instance method of, then it is not really an instance
> method and need not and I would say should not be masqueraded as
> one. If the function is a static method, then it should be labeled
> as one and no 'self' is not needed and auto insertion would be a
> mistake. In brief, I assume the OP wants 'self' inserted in the body
> because inserting it only in the parameter list and never using it
> in the body is either silly or wrong.
I think you misunderstood him. What he wants is to write
class foo:
def bar(arg):
self.whatever = arg + 1
instead of
class foo:
def bar(self, arg)
self.whatever = arg + 1
so 'self' should *automatically* only be inserted in the function
declaration, and *manually* be typed for attributes.
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
»It is not worth an intelligent man's time to be in the majority.
By definition, there are already enough people to do that.«
-J.H. Hardy
PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
