Hallöchen!
Kay Schluehr writes:
> On 24 Jul., 11:40, Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Bruno Desthuilliers writes:
>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> How would you handle this case with an implicit 'self' :
>>>
>>> class Foo(object):
>>> pass
>>>
>>> def bar(self):
>>> print self
>>>
>>> Foo.bar = bar
>>
>> Just like this. However, the compiler could add "self" to
>> non-decorated methods which are defined within "class".
>
> And $self2, $self3, ... to the object methods of nested classes
> and $cls2, $cls3, ... to the classmethods of those classes...?
One could surely find ways to realise this. However, the design
goal should be: Make the frequent case simple, and the rare case
possible.
(Actually, I'm -0 on this anyway because I forget "self" very
seldomly, and you would still have ".self" all over the place.)
Tschö,
Torsten.
--
Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus
Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
