Rob Warnock wrote:
Martin Gregorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+---------------
| John W Kennedy wrote:
| > No, the "thunks" were necessary at the machine-language level to
| > /implement/ ALGOL 60, but they could not be expressed /in/ ALGOL.
|
| Are you sure about that?
+---------------
I don't know if John is, but *I* am! ;-}
At this point we are so far off topic for clj.programmer, but still impinging
on functional programming issues with the discussion of closures, et al., that
I respectfully request that you all exclude clj.programmer from followups to
this thread.
(f-u set to comp.lang.functional)
--
Lew
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
