On Jul 18, 10:36 am, bgeddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > the OP's post revolved around having a rewritable > set of "labels" - which could be recorded at one time and when re > referenced the new definitions of those labels would be used. For > example a "collection" (list,dictionary,tuple) could be made of these > "labels" and then the underlying code accessed by the labels changed. If > the code was now ran indirectly by referencing the list then the new > code would be ran.
This notion is as dangerous and ludicrous as the COBOL ALTER verb. > These building blocks are how parsers are built and > the basis of language. Huh? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
