<snip> > > 2) What is the meaning of the comment in astgen.py ? Are the Python > > maintainers unhappy with the design of the AST ?3 > > Node, I think, is talking about a node in the parse tree. (AST is > generated from another parse tree.) See PEP 339 for details. > <snip>
Thanks, PEP 339 clarified a lot to me. I wonder, though, at the need for two Python compilation frameworks in the same code base. While CPython uses the flow described in PEP 339 (parsing to an AST generated from ASDL), the compiler module of the standard library takes a different approach, with a custom AST description syntax in ast.txt Why aren't the two methods unified. I.e. can't the compiler.ast module be also generated from ASDL, and provide a more unified interface to the real thing ? Eli -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
