Tim Roberts wrote:
"John Salerno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it correct to say that Mako allows you to embed Python code within HTML,
whereas Cheetah requires a certain amount of "tweaking" of Python code so
that it isn't really code you could just run independently in the
interpreter?
I'm getting that impression from what I see so far.
What gives you that impression? I'm just curious. Other than the special
characters used, my impression is that the two are far more similar than
they are different.
Well, that opinion was based mostly on my initial exposure to each one.
The main reason was that Cheetah seems to require a lot of $ signs, even
in the Pyton code itself, such as:
for $thing in $things: etc....
whereas with Mako you can just write straight Python code. Overall I
think I'm liking Mako better, which is fine since I want to learn Pylons
and it's the default. :)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
