On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:57:44 -0700 (PDT), Lie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2:26 am, Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I was wondering if anyone can explain this. My understanding is that 'is'
>> checks if the object is the same. However, in that case, why this
>> inconsistency for short strings? I would expect a 'False' for all three
>> comparisons. This is reproducible across two different machines, so it is
>> not just a local quirk. I'm running Debian etch with Python 2.4.4 (the
>> default).
>> Thanks, Faheem.
>>
>> In [1]: a = '--'
>>
>> In [2]: a is '--'
>> Out[2]: False
>>
>> In [4]: a = '-'
>>
>> In [5]: a is '-'
>> Out[5]: True
>>
>> In [6]: a = 'foo'
>>
>> In [7]: a is 'foo'
>> Out[7]: True
>
> Yes, this happens because of small objects caching. When small
> integers or short strings are created, there are possibility that they
> might refer to the same objects behind-the-scene. Don't rely on this
> behavior.
Yes, but why is '-' and 'foo' cached, and not '--'? Do you know what
the basis of the choice is?
Faheem.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
