The carbonbased lifeform Tim Roberts inspired comp.lang.python with: > Nick Craig-Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>Hmmm, 10,000,000 cycles (40 ms @2.5GHz) is nowhere near the ~90,000 >>second jump in time.clock() output reported by the OP. I wonder if >>there could be a different cause? > > Just wild theorizing, but it's possible that they are actually getting a > negative delta, and some kind of signed/unsigned manipulation produces the > 90,000 number.
Actually, in previous runs I /did/ see negative timestamps using time.clock(). Bizar. Theo -- theo at van-werkhoven.nl ICQ:277217131 SuSE Linux linuxcounter.org: 99872 Jabber:muadib at jabber.xs4all.nl AMD XP3000+ 1024MB "ik _heb_ niets tegen Microsoft, ik heb iets tegen de uitwassen *van* Microsoft" -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
