alex23 wrote: «No, what was generally rejected was the idea that *you* could bring more clarity to the documentation, based on the complete absence of it in your posts & "essays". Basically, noone wanted docs that would randomly degenerate into ad hominem accusations of elitism aimed at the module authors.»
Dear Alex moron number 23, The art of writing takes many forms. Let's take, the hallowed name Shakespeare. Imagine, we injest his writing style into modern journalism. What is the resulting quality? It would be condemned as the worst journalism possible. Imprecise, logorrhea, obscure, and in general, much ado about nothing. On the other hand, if we apply the spirit of scientific report into poetry, what is the resulting quality? Dry, inert, dead. A man without a cock, a woman without tits. You see, i had to craft my style to fit occasions. In dealing with newsgroup morons like yourself, the proper style is to infuse insult with fanfare. Further readings: The Tragedy Of Titus Andronicus http://xahlee.org/p/titus/titus.html Politics and the English Language http://xahlee.org/p/george_orwell_english.html English Lawers (or, how to master writing) http://xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/writ/english_lawers.html Xah [EMAIL PROTECTED] ∑ http://xahlee.org/ ☄ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
