"Ben Finney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | So, when not using the values that come from the controlling iterator, | it's good to make that explicit. If Python supported it, we might | prefer to use no name at all for something that isn't used, but the | 'for' syntax doesn't allow that.
But I presume it could if [target 'in'] were optional. for range(n): <stuff to do n times> It is possible this has been proposed and rejected, but I have no specific memory. tjr -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
