On May 6, 1:00 pm, hdante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 6, 12:28 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > There's a process decorator to functions in a module.
>
> > [supposes]
>
> > @process
> > def datafile( processdict ):
> > processdict.modify( )
> > op= yield
> > op.call( ) in processdict
> > # op.call( ) in namespace
>
> > More simply:
>
> > @process
> > def datafile( processdict ):
> > processdict.modify( )
> > interaction_object= yield
> > invoke( interaction_object, processdict )
> > #or interaction_object.invoke( **processdict )
> > processdict.commit( )
>
> > Making each execution of process a self-modifying disk file.
> > Interaction_object could be binary or text. If text, we'd have a
> > cross-language executable, but I'm suspicious it wouldn't be vacuous
> > as a Python of Python composition: would other languages pass other
> > than Python programs?
>
> > I think relational databases are the only in there. In other words, I
> > think Python would make a wholly better stored procedure and query
> > language than those of databases. Certainly I'm suspicious that's
> > naivete speaking up; I question, would it? Is there more risk of or
> > opportunity for malicious execution? Simply put, can we get
> > primitives in to databases? What's an example of a [optionally real]
> > operation on the primitives that doesn't map pretty well into SQL?
> > How do you want to write base-case scenarios if they're going to be
> > literals?
>
> Datafiles could be implemented with SQL. Consider SQL:
>
> SELECT * FROM process_dict where id = 1
> .
> SELECT * FROM process_dict where id = 1
>
> Obviously, this is all a supposition, I'm not claiming the code is
> perfect (or am I ?). If datafiles could be implemented with SQL and
> storing text requires datafiles, then I can store text with datafiles
> (haha !). Would you consider doing this ? One could even store python
> decorated serialized code using SQL [supposition]. But would it be
> useful [haha !] ?
>
> I don't know.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Serialized code has line numbers, which is fine in Python. (Tab-
indent even comes easier, though it's not clear what granularity
you're storing at, whether each "indention block" gets its own table
or not.)
You are asking for a per-object table.
a= { }
b= [ ]
a[ 'what' ]= object( )
id= new_id( )
process_vars[ id ]= object( )
insert into process_dict.variable_9782 values ( id )
insert into process_dict.variable_9371 values ( 'what', NONPRIMITIVE,
id )
b.append( None )
insert into process_dict.variable_8224 values ( NULL )
b.insert( 0, 0 )
update process_dict.variable_8224 set "column_1"= 0 where index= 0
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
