Thorsten Kampe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Ben Finney (Fri, 02 May 2008 23:30:01 +1000)
> > The OP was asking why people prefer on over the other. My answer
> > is that I prefer specifying "give me the default OS Python"
> > because anything not installed by the OS is to non-standardised
> > for me to worry about.
> >
> > Others may prefer something different, but then they get to wear
> > whatever problems occur as a result of that choice. I continue to
> > be bemused by that preference, and nothing that I've seen so far
> > in this thread illuminates the issue more.
>
> You're missing the point. Apart from the really dubious terms you
> use ("OS installable package"), using env in the first line has
> exactly the effect to use the default path of Python (which is the
> first entry in your path)
No, because it's quite common for the PATH variable to have
'/usr/local/bin' appear *before* both of '/bin' and '/usr/bin'.
If the system has a sysadmin-installed '/usr/local/bin/python'
installed as well as the OS-installed '/usr/bin/python', then the two
shebang options the OP raised will behave differently on such a
system. This seems to be quite the point of the discussion.
--
\ "Time's fun when you're having flies." -- Kermit the Frog |
`\ |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
