Hallöchen!
Diez B. Roggisch writes:
>> However, join() is really bizarre. The list rather than the
>> separator should be the leading actor.
>
> Certainly *not*! This would be the way ruby does it, and IMHO it
> does not make sense to add join as a string-processing related
> method/functionality to a general purpose sequence type.
Okay, my wording was unfortunate. However, I've already twice
(before and after the above posting of mine) said what I mean,
namely join(list, separator), possibly with a default value for
"separator".
Tschö,
Torsten.
--
Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus
Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(See http://ime.webhop.org for further contact info.)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
