On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Jorgen Grahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OP: keep in mind that your users do not see any gain from you using > 2.5. All they see is something that makes your software harder to > install. At some point you can dismiss them as living in the Stone Age, > but the Stone Age is currently 2.1 or something. Maybe 2.2 is, too. Except for the memory bug which 2.5 fixed (not giving memory back), which in some cases with 2.4 could be a really large issue. But in that case you get the benefit whether it was "coded for" 2.5 or not. So it is still safest to develop for a lower common denominator. For me, the best things about 2.5 were the memory fixes/performance, and the inclusion of ctypes in the standard library. The language upgrades are mostly corner cases. If I were the OP, and those corner situations aren't too big of an issue, I would restrict my usage to 2.4 or even 2.3 to allow easier adoption of the software. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
