On Apr 17, 1:03 pm, Jonathan Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 17, 1:18 am, Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Apr 17, 3:37 am, Jonathan Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > If you can't rewrite > > > your algorithm to be disk or network bound, next optimization step is > > > C. > > > I'm sorry, but I don't like being told to use C. Perhaps I would like > > the expressiveness of Python, am willing to accept the cost in > > performance, but would also like to take advantage of technology to > > get performance gains when I can? What's so unreasonable about that? > > If you're satisfied then don't take the next optimization step.
Where do you see the word "satisfied" in what I wrote? Carl Banks -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
