On Apr 13, 12:33 am, Charles D Hixson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Arnaud Delobelle wrote: > >>>> class MetaX(type): > > > ... @property > > ... def spam(self): return 'eggs' > > ... > > >>>> class X(object): > > > ... __metaclass__ = MetaX > > ... > > >>>> X.spam > > > 'eggs' > > > HTH > > > -- > > Arnau > > Thanks. I can make that work. Is it possible to move the entire > implementation of the interpretation of _valueMap, below, into > properties in some similar way? I'm referring to the part managed by > __getattr__ below. > I want a hundred or so read-only variables, and I'm not sure the best > way to achieve it.
[snip code sample] * Do you want to be able to access your attributes from instances as well or from the class object only? The metaclass trick creates attributes only accessible from the class object, i.e. in my example above: >>> x=X() >>> x.spam Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> AttributeError: 'X' object has no attribute 'spam' * If you have a hundred of so names and values, are you sure you want to expose them as attributes? It seems to me that they should be in their own namespace (as keys in a mapping or attributes of a subobject) -- Arnaud -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
