On Apr 12, 12:03 am, Michel Bouwmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Qt Designer. And creating the GUI yourself in the text editor isn't that > bad, plus you have much better control over it.
If you like designing isual elements in an editor, that's fine for me! I don't, And as I don't do it all the time, I tend to forget constructional details and waste life googling. So for me it's pain without cognition. AKA waste of life. Numerous RAD' env's, fx Delphi, suggests this kind of incredibly boring almost pre-historic, self-pestering non-sense pain is ancient, and I happen to agree. It's an orthodox and monkish way of programming. Some like it that way and that's none of my business. I don't like it that way. Designing GUI in a text-editor (for me) always produce a : "good enough" and consumes a lot of life. The Boa constructor / Delphi way produce "what I want" without _wasting life_. But Boa is too unstable, and does not claim otherwise, and there's no descent alternative I'm aware of. So, GUI Python still sucks far too much. Console and web Python indeed does not. So if the Python Foundation arrange a "Descent RAD" effort, I'll happily donate $100 for starters. I think Python should be just as easily GUI'able as it is Console'able. Python is soon 20 years old! -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list