On Apr 11, 8:27 pm, Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 11, 2:33 pm, Lie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > Another mistake, in an unquantized value the probability of getting
> > exactly 0.5 (or any other number specified) is not 0 but an
> > infinitesimal (i.e. lim(x) where x -> 0 (BUT NOT ZERO))
>
> I'm not sure you'll get many takers for this point of view. If X is
> a random variable uniformly distributed on the interval [0, 1) then
> the probability that X == 0.5 is indeed exactly 0, using conventional
> definitions. (And if you're not using conventional definitions, you
> should say so....)
And I would like to know what unconventional - but mathematically
meaningful - definitions lead to
lim x != 0
x -> 0
--
Arnaud
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
