On Apr 2, 11:04 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > En Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:11:30 -0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > > On Apr 1, 10:42 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> En Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:56:50 -0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > >> yield *iterable > > >> could be used as a shortcut for this: > > >> for __temp in iterable: yield __temp > > > How serious were you about that? > > Not so much, I haven't thougth enough on it. Looks fine in principle, but > yield expressions may be a problem. > > -- > Gabriel Genellina
Funnily, there's a patch for py3k to make this work as in your idea. It's currently being discussed on python-3000 :) -- Arnaud -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
