En Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:54:33 -0300, João Neves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On 2 Abr, 21:38, "Chris Mellon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> There is no need to overwrite co_code. Create a new code object with >> your desired bytecode and use that instead. > > Yes, it may work (haven't tested - isn't there any problem with stuff > like co_name, for instance?), but for simplicity's sake, wouldn't it > be far more convenient if you could just write over co_code? :) > In the end, it's all a matter of convenience, I guess. Functions aren't just code - they contain the environment needed to actually call the code. But they're easy to create given a code object: py> import new py> new.function <type 'function'> py> help(new.function) Help on class function in module __builtin__: class function(object) | function(code, globals[, name[, argdefs[, closure]]]) | | Create a function object from a code object and a dictionary. | The optional name string overrides the name from the code object. | The optional argdefs tuple specifies the default argument values. | The optional closure tuple supplies the bindings for free variables. py> import types py> types.FunctionType is new.function is type(lambda:0) True -- Gabriel Genellina -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
