On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Gabriel Genellina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> En Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:15:57 -0300, Jorge Vargas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > escribió: > > > as for the original question, the point of going unicode is not to > > make code unicode, but to make code's output unicode. thin of print > > calls and templates and comments the world's complexity in languages. > > sadly most english speaking people think unicode is irrelevant because > > ASCII has everything, but their narrow world is what's wrong. > > Python 3 is a good step in that direction. Strings are unicode, > identifiers are not restricted to ASCII, and the default source encoding > is not ASCII anymore (but I don't remember which one). UTF-8 (http://python.org/dev/peps/pep-3120/) -- kv
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
