On Mar 29, 12:41 pm, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED] cybersource.com.au> wrote: > Given that <= is a comparison operator, not an assignment, why do you > jump to the conclusion that != is an assignment? Why don't you argue that > "x <= y" means "assign the value of x<y to x"?
Yes, you are right, that could be confusing ;). > Since you jump to an invalid conclusion about !=, the rest of your > argument fails. No, you said <= could be confusing, but we're talking about <> here, and there is no confusion about that :). -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list