On Mar 16, 5:09 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote: > fumanchu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is my third PyCon, and I've found a reasonably-sized cadre of > > people who come for the hallway conversations plus a Bof or two, > > having given up on hearing anything new, useful, or inspiring in the > > talks. There are several people I know who would like to see a more > > advanced academic track. > > Finally, trying to satisfy a thousand people is impossible.
Well understood. Sorry if I implied it was an easy job. I know it isn't. > If you did not like the programming this year (aside from the sponsor > talks) and you did not participate in organizing PyCon or in delivering > presentations, it is YOUR FAULT. PERIOD. EXCLAMATION POINT! This would be true, except that the two talks I proposed last year were essentially denied because they were too advanced, so I didn't even bother this year. Perhaps I should have, but the PERIOD needs to at least be replaced by a COMMA as long as the talk-acceptance committee continues to reject more advanced talk topics in favor of HOWTOs and Introduction To Package X. Robert Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
