Hi

How can I make a *class* attribute read-only ?

The answer must be pretty obvious but I just can't find it (it's late and I've spent all day on metaclasses, descriptors and the like, which, as fun as it is, may have side-effects on intellectual abilities...)

*The context:*

# library code
class AbstractBaseClass(object):
   # snip some stuff here,
   # a part of it depending on the derived classes
   # defining class attribute class_private_attrib

# client code
class SubClass(AbstractBaseClass):
   class_private_attrib = "my private attrib"
   # snip


*What I'm looking for: (if possible)*

>>SubClass.class_private_attrib
"my private attrib"
>>SubClass.class_private_attrib = "toto"
AttributeError : SubClass.class_private_attrib is read only
>>s = SubClass()
>>s.class_private_attribute = "toto"
AttributeError : SubClass.class_private_attrib is read only

*What I've tried: (simplified as possible)*

class ReadOnlyDescriptor(object):
    def __init__(self, name, initval=None):
        self._val = initval
        self._name = name

    def __get__(self, obj, objtype):
        print 'Retrieving', self._name
        return self._val

    def __set__(self, obj, val):
        raise AttributeError, \
        "%s.%s is ReadOnly"  % (obj.__class.__.__name__, self._name)

class SubClass(object):
   class_private_attrib = ReadOnlyDescriptor("class_private_attrib",
                                              "my private attrib")
   # snip

*What i get:*
>>SubClass.class_private_attrib
Retrieving class_private_attrib
"my private attrib"
>>SubClass.class_private_attrib = "toto"
>>SubClass.class_private_attrib
"toto"
>>SubClass.__dict__['class_private_attrib']
"toto"
>> s = SubClass()
>> s.class_private_attrib
"toto" # of course :(

*What I understand:*
Ok, I've re-read the manual, noticed that data descriptors __set__() method was only called when an instance attribute is set (which is obvious from the prototypes of the methods). My solution is plain wrong and I should have guess without ever trying. duh :(



Now please have mercy, you Noble Pythoneers : what's the trick to prevent client code to accidentally mess with the class's dict ? (most client code - apart from subclass definitions - shouldn't even bother about the existence of this attribute, it's there for the library internal usage)


NB : in the real code I'm also messing with the AbstractBaseClass's meta_class for other stuff (so it's not a problem if the solution involves metaclasses), but I've tested with the simplified example above, which exhibits the same problem.

TIA
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for p in '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.split('@')])"
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to