2 things: 1st. there is a python mailing list for people interested in C++ extension type stuff 2nd. SWIG is useless and overly complicated, its much easier to just generate your own C++ code by hand, less confusion, and much more clarity. I find no value in using anything else. People complain about the "boilerplate" code, but honestly, copy & paste, change three characters, and you're done. And you know exactly what is happening, how when and why.
2008/3/11, Chris Mellon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > "Cooper, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ... > > > > | Are there any Python C API experts/SWIG experts out there that can > help > > | me with this issue please. > > > > | I',m currently using SWIG to generate a python interface to a C DLL. > > > > Some people have switched to using ctypes for this, and many other SWIG > > users have stopped reading clp. But I hope someone answers who can. > > > > > Using Pyrex or Cython is likely to be much easier than using SWIG for > this. > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
