HallÃchen! Ville Vainio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "Torsten" == Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>> There would be keywords for static and class methods, no > >>> distinction between Unicode and non-Unicode > > >> You couldn't do that 15 years ago because there were no Unicode > >> that time. > > Torsten> I've never said that Guido was just too stupid at that > Torsten> time. I only said "but you can definitely see that it's > Torsten> the oldest one". In other words, a Ruby six years older > Torsten> than the real one would have the same problem. And who > Torsten> knows how C# looks like in 10 years. > > http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?PythonVsRuby > > seems to suggest that Python has better Unicode support than Ruby. True. When you google for it, you read "Japanese hate Unicode". :-/ Well, then this is an invalid example. TschÃ, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
