>> You should also take a look at wxGlade: >> >> http://wxglade.sourceforge.net/ >> >> which sits on top of wxPython: >> >> http://wxpython.org/ >> >> which wraps wxWidgets: >> >> http://www.wxwindows.org/ > > I have used wxGlade, and while it worked well > enough, it didn't seem to fit my brain. I > always found myself "thinking backwards" in order > to guess how the tool needed me to do things. > For me, though, everytime I see raw wxPython code > these days I cringe, and am thankful that I don't > have to deal with it anymore.
May i see a short sample of the two different ways of coding, please? I'm very curious how they differ (and of course, decide what's the most pleasurable way for me). As long as we're on the subject, i also wonder if there's a general concensus on which technology is recommended in the different types of projects that are developed. (E.g. "use A for small/fast fixes, use B for stuff you'll need to maintain later on".) -- Regards Konrad Viltersten -------------------------------- sleep - a substitute for coffee for the poor ambition - lack of sense to be lazy -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
