Piet van Oostrum wrote: >>>>>> "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (GG) wrote: > >>GG> "Given this indispensable process and architecture issue, isn't it >>obvious GG> that it's totally irrelevant to the system's overall safety >>whether the GG> compiler has performed the further smattering of >>semantically puny GG> 'verifications' allowed by mandatory-declaration, >>stating-typing GG> languages?" - Alex Martelli > > I couldn't find the original of this. I would like to see it in its > context. Googling didn't reveal anything but this Python-URL.
My google is better than yours then: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2003-March/193864.html Peter -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
