Larry Bugbee wrote: > And the migration to Python is due in large part because of an > additional factor of 3-4x in personal productivity (over Java). > Improvements in runtime performance wouldn't hurt, but for many > applications that's not an issue. (If optional data typing were
You mean static data typing, right? Are there any known holes in the dynamic type system that still need to be plugged? (I haven't heard of any.) > offered, Python's penetration in the enterprise space would be even > higher, and I suspect there would be performance gains as well.) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
