[JanC] > The code below makes it possible to write assembler code for different > architectures (in case pyasm ever supports that ;) and also a Python > code version to use when running on a system where no assembler code > can be used. It prints:
[Michael] > Another (perhaps wacky) approach would be to change the assembler > source syntax > enough to make it legal Python - in particular, this means parenthesizing >the > arguments - then it can just be stored in-line with other Python source. This > has the additional benefit that one could write support functions to enable > the > source to be executed interactively in Python. > > The following example uses the CPython opcodes, represented as Python > functions. > Python control structures 'while' and 'if' are used as assembler directives > for flow. I've been trying to come up with responses to these two posts, but I'm just plain speechless. That should be taken as a complement. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
