"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's not exactly true, i.e. it isn't mark-and-sweep, but some similar > scheme that allows incremental collection without write barriers. This > particular scheme heavily relies on refcounting itself (specifically, > an object is garbage in a certain generation when all references to > it come from the same generation).
Ah, thanks. I made another post which I guess is also somewhat wrong. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
