"Sun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was wondering why can't I use a format as "var = {} " to
> "var=list()" in set variable, and decided not to bother with it.
Python 3.0 will gain syntax to specify a literal of type 'set'
<URL:http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3100/>::
>>> {17, "foo", 12.5}
set([17, 'foo', 12.5])
but this won't allow you to declare an empty set literal, because
that's already easy with 'set()', and '{}' is taken already for an
empty dict literal.
--
\ “Unix is an operating system, OS/2 is half an operating system, |
`\ Windows is a shell, and DOS is a boot partition virus.” |
_o__) —Peter H. Coffin |
Ben Finney
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
