Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> Paul Rubin a écrit :
>>> ki lo wrote:
>>>> I have type variable which may have been set to 'D' or 'E'
>>>>
>>>> Now, which one of following statements are more efficient
>>>>
>>>> if type =='D' or type == 'E':
>>>>
>>>> or
>>>>
>>>> if re.search("D|E", type):
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know because the function is going to called 10s of millions
>>>> of times.
>>> For maximum efficiency you have to use a set.
>> if type in 'DE': ...
>>
>> might be faster.
>
> It might also be wrong if there's a possibility that type=='DE' :
> >>> "DE" in "DE"
> True
>
>
If the "type" variable really is a type, of course, then the real
solution is hardly radical: stop using the names of types and start
using the types:
>>> class D(object): pass
...
>>> type(D)
<type 'type'>
>>> D
<class '__main__.D'>
>>> d = D()
>>> type(d)
<class '__main__.D'>
>>> class E(object): pass
...
>>> e = E()
>>> o = object()
>>> for c in d, e, o:
... print c, (type(c) in (D, E))
...
<__main__.D object at 0x7ff3150c> True
<__main__.E object at 0x7ff3156c> True
<object object at 0x7ff81478> False
>>>
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
