[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > def run3( block ): > for _ in range( 3 ): > block() > > run3(): > normal_suite() > > Introduces new syntax; arbitrary functions can follow 'colon'. > > Maintains readability, meaning is consistent. > > Equivalent to: > > def run3( block ): > for _ in range( 3 ): > block() > > @run3 > def anonfunc(): > normal_suite() > > Simplification in cases in which decorators are use often.
This is non-sensical - how do you invoke anonfunc? They would all bind to the same name, run3. Or to no name as all, as your "spec" lacks that. Besides, it's butt-ugly IMHO. But taste comes after proper definition... Diez -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
